Video is available - Log in to view. You must be registered to the event to view content
For attending this session, you can claim 1.5 EACCME credits
After attending this session, attendees should be able to:
1) compare the pros and cons of transplanting non-adherent patients OR Debate the pros and cons of retransplantation in the setting of non-compliance
2) create a plan for the utilization of higher risk organs in transplantation OR Consider the necessity to redefine acceptable outcome thresholds using higher risk donors and organs
3) analyze the benefits of the different types of pediatric liver donors OR Weigh the impact of using less than ideal liver allografts in the pediatric population
4) know that non-adherence (NA) to medical regimen after transplantation remains as the leading cause of graft loss.Adverse chilhood experiences and depression in adolescents obseved after transplantation must be diagnosed and trated because they are related to NA
Dr. Daniel DD D'Agostino Dany, Argentina
Retransplant after graft loss due to non-adherences-worthy of a second chance? PRO
Dr. Jose Pablo Garbanzo Corrales, Costa Rica
Retransplant after graft loss due to non-adherences-worthy of a second chance? CON
Dr. Liliana Bisigniano MD, Argentina
Barriers to redefining and safely utilizing higher risk organs in transplantation - is it time to recalibrate? PRO
Prof. Simone Strasser, Australia
Barriers to redefining and safely utilizing higher risk organs in transplantation - is it time to recalibrate? CON
Joao Seda Neto, Brazil
Should we only do pediatric liver transplant with "optimal donors"? (Optimal graft vs marginal livers included NHBD) PRO
Mureo Kasahara, Japan
Should we only do pediatric liver transplant with "optimal donors"? (Optimal graft vs marginal livers included NHBD) CON
